neskor

ok, hajde da suzimo onda izbor
posto si cuo oba, sta bi ti uzeo Tannoy od 15" ili Altec 604G?

a mozda malo da se opustis 

a mozda malo da se opustis 

a mozda malo da se opustis 

...nećeš se ti naslušati muzike sa ploča u skorije vreme...sorry...

a mozda malo da se opustis 

Iole ozbiljniji snimci idu na minimum 15 IPS / 38.10 cm/s dok vrhunski studiji koriste 30 IPS / 76.2 cm/s.
Brzina od 7 IPS /19 cm/s se koristi samo za kucnu radinost.
Imao sam Nakamichi Dragon sveze srvisiran i kalibrisan i mogu reci da nije ni priblizno zvucao kao stari Studer B67 MKII.
Nemojte se uopste zanositi da vrhunski dek moze da zvuci bolje od vrhunskog R2R

Daans sam naleteo na zanimljiv post coveka koji ima vrhunski R2R i vinil sistem.
Evo sta on kaze:
The short answer is that R2R is very significantly better than a high quality LP system, providing the source material is ok (s0me tapes haven't survived as well as others, for instance).
1) Speed stability - absolutely rock solid with tape - no wavering on piano notes etc.. Verdier is very good, but you can hear the (very subtle) knock from the knot in the linen thread on every platter rotation
2) Dynamic range - the Verdier with the battery PSU is pretty much inky black on the blank grooves in between tracks. No vinyl noise or mechanical noise. With tape, you can get a tiny bit of tape hiss, esp if the tape used is several generations down from the original; you can minimise this by using something like Dolby A or Dolby SR (I have 2 Dolby 363 machines with A and SR - I just haven't got round to plugging them in yet). However, the tape medium is able to capture and transmit a much greater dynamic range compared to the grooves of an LP. After all the mastering engineer has to apply compression and EQ to cut the lacquer. You can hear this difference very easily between a master tape and a good vinyl pressing.
3) Sound quality on tape is the same at the end as at the beginning - unlike records. Tape has a constants linear velocity of medium over the head (transducer). Records have a constant angular velocity, which means that the amount on information gets less and less with each rotation of the record; hence the inner grooves don't sound as good.
4) Microdynamics are much better on tape - subtleties of brush use on drums, additional bits (e.g. the crowd noise and applause on Sgt Pepper's). General dynamics are faster with tape i.e. drums, crescendos etc
5) Soundstage is uncompromised on tape (obviously this depends on the original recording).
I have been listening to hi-fi for 35 years now, and the last two years of R2R have been a complete revelation. I have heard some very good vinyl replay systems in my life, but none of them approach a 15 IPS master tape.
 

 
 

Iole ozbiljniji snimci idu na minimum 15 IPS / 38.10 cm/s dok vrhunski studiji koriste 30 IPS / 76.2 cm/s.
Brzina od 7 IPS /19 cm/s se koristi samo za kucnu radinost.
Imao sam Nakamichi Dragon sveze srvisiran i kalibrisan i mogu reci da nije ni priblizno zvucao kao stari Studer B67 MKII.
Nemojte se uopste zanositi da vrhunski dek moze da zvuci bolje od vrhunskog R2R

Iole ozbiljniji snimci idu na minimum 15 IPS / 38.10 cm/s dok vrhunski studiji koriste 30 IPS / 76.2 cm/s.
Brzina od 7 IPS /19 cm/s se koristi samo za kucnu radinost.
Imao sam Nakamichi Dragon sveze srvisiran i kalibrisan i mogu reci da nije ni priblizno zvucao kao stari Studer B67 MKII.
Nemojte se uopste zanositi da vrhunski dek moze da zvuci bolje od vrhunskog R2R

Daans sam naleteo na zanimljiv post coveka koji ima vrhunski R2R i vinil sistem.
Evo sta on kaze:
The short answer is that R2R is very significantly better than a high quality LP system, providing the source material is ok (s0me tapes haven't survived as well as others, for instance).
1) Speed stability - absolutely rock solid with tape - no wavering on piano notes etc.. Verdier is very good, but you can hear the (very subtle) knock from the knot in the linen thread on every platter rotation
2) Dynamic range - the Verdier with the battery PSU is pretty much inky black on the blank grooves in between tracks. No vinyl noise or mechanical noise. With tape, you can get a tiny bit of tape hiss, esp if the tape used is several generations down from the original; you can minimise this by using something like Dolby A or Dolby SR (I have 2 Dolby 363 machines with A and SR - I just haven't got round to plugging them in yet). However, the tape medium is able to capture and transmit a much greater dynamic range compared to the grooves of an LP. After all the mastering engineer has to apply compression and EQ to cut the lacquer. You can hear this difference very easily between a master tape and a good vinyl pressing.
3) Sound quality on tape is the same at the end as at the beginning - unlike records. Tape has a constants linear velocity of medium over the head (transducer). Records have a constant angular velocity, which means that the amount on information gets less and less with each rotation of the record; hence the inner grooves don't sound as good.
4) Microdynamics are much better on tape - subtleties of brush use on drums, additional bits (e.g. the crowd noise and applause on Sgt Pepper's). General dynamics are faster with tape i.e. drums, crescendos etc
5) Soundstage is uncompromised on tape (obviously this depends on the original recording).
I have been listening to hi-fi for 35 years now, and the last two years of R2R have been a complete revelation. I have heard some very good vinyl replay systems in my life, but none of them approach a 15 IPS master tape.
 

 
 

Daans sam naleteo na zanimljiv post coveka koji ima vrhunski R2R i vinil sistem.
Evo sta on kaze:
The short answer is that R2R is very significantly better than a high quality LP system, providing the source material is ok (s0me tapes haven't survived as well as others, for instance).
1) Speed stability - absolutely rock solid with tape - no wavering on piano notes etc.. Verdier is very good, but you can hear the (very subtle) knock from the knot in the linen thread on every platter rotation
2) Dynamic range - the Verdier with the battery PSU is pretty much inky black on the blank grooves in between tracks. No vinyl noise or mechanical noise. With tape, you can get a tiny bit of tape hiss, esp if the tape used is several generations down from the original; you can minimise this by using something like Dolby A or Dolby SR (I have 2 Dolby 363 machines with A and SR - I just haven't got round to plugging them in yet). However, the tape medium is able to capture and transmit a much greater dynamic range compared to the grooves of an LP. After all the mastering engineer has to apply compression and EQ to cut the lacquer. You can hear this difference very easily between a master tape and a good vinyl pressing.
3) Sound quality on tape is the same at the end as at the beginning - unlike records. Tape has a constants linear velocity of medium over the head (transducer). Records have a constant angular velocity, which means that the amount on information gets less and less with each rotation of the record; hence the inner grooves don't sound as good.
4) Microdynamics are much better on tape - subtleties of brush use on drums, additional bits (e.g. the crowd noise and applause on Sgt Pepper's). General dynamics are faster with tape i.e. drums, crescendos etc
5) Soundstage is uncompromised on tape (obviously this depends on the original recording).
I have been listening to hi-fi for 35 years now, and the last two years of R2R have been a complete revelation. I have heard some very good vinyl replay systems in my life, but none of them approach a 15 IPS master tape.
 

 
 

Tannoy ponovo pokrece proizvodnju legendarnih modela

Tannoy ponovo pokrece proizvodnju legendarnih modela

Tannoy ponovo pokrece proizvodnju legendarnih modela

Tannoy ponovo pokrece proizvodnju legendarnih modela

Revox B215-S , izgleda i zvuči vanserijski 
 

ja imam te trafoe iz sonija
ako je iz trakasa onda je to ovo
 
 
 

ja imam te trafoe iz sonija
ako je iz trakasa onda je to ovo
 
 
 

...ništa kolege neće biti od "demfiranja" bez punjenja osiromašenim uranijumom...na žalost tenkovi ne idu redovno utorkom i četvrtkom pa audiofili na dedinju moraju da sačekaju službeni glasnik da vide da li ima pokreta mehanizovane brigade ne bi li se slušale ploče na DD gramofonz
...preteraste ga brate...

Plith sam ja pravio ovde u BG.
Meni se cini da je bolje svirao skeleton plinth. To nije bas validno poredjenje jer je dosta vremena proteklo u medjuvremenu, a i pitanje je da li se isto cuju ta dva Garrarda.
Bilo bi dobro kada bi se isti gramofon testitao na oba plintha.

Inace pre neki dan sam uradio uporedni test Garrard 401 vs Thorens TD124 MKII vs EMT 930st. Sva tri su koriscena samo kao transport. Svaka baza je inace sveze servisirana.
U svim poredjenjima rucka je bila Thomas Schick od 12" sa Ortofon SPU Gold zvucnicom , samo se baza menjala.
PO MENI, definitivno EMT 930st je bio pobednik u svim segmentima, zatim vrlo blizu Garrard, a tek zatim Thorens.
 

Inace pre neki dan sam uradio uporedni test Garrard 401 vs Thorens TD124 MKII vs EMT 930st. Sva tri su koriscena samo kao transport. Svaka baza je inace sveze servisirana.
U svim poredjenjima rucka je bila Thomas Schick od 12" sa Ortofon SPU Gold zvucnicom , samo se baza menjala.
PO MENI, definitivno EMT 930st je bio pobednik u svim segmentima, zatim vrlo blizu Garrard, a tek zatim Thorens.