https://www.stereophile.com/content/first-watt-sit-3-power-amplifier-page-2
druga strana
Summary 2 Did the First Watt SIT-3 sound like a single-ended-triode tube amplifier? Not really. It didn't sound like any other amp I know, either. I compared the SIT-3 directly to my Line Magnetic LM-518 IA tubed integrated amp ($4450) and found it sounded noticeably less vivid. The LM-518 IA was clearly more airy and extended in and descriptive of the top two octaves. However, the SIT-3's midrange and bass were cleaner, fuller, more textured, more rich in information. The SIT-3 produced denser, more specific images
može da bude i ne mora BITI...
evo jednog citata koji objasnjava kritike
If I can recommend you all audio people something: be relaxed, do not make the mistake to interpret other peoples words with your own perception. Every human being lives in his own reality. Until you hear that something, preferably twice coz once your excitement can trick you...., dont believe the hype
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/333079-visit-romy-cats-macondo.html#post5676773
dakle zavisi od percepcija..... da ne kažem da postoje plaćeni kritičari uređaja - nebitno da li su tranzistori ii lampe....
slično je kao sa filmskom kritikom.... nema veze sa mozgom... recimo neke filmove su nahvalili a totalno su sranje i obrnuto.
ili kao kad se porede operativni sistemi ..... Computer hardware....
zavisi šta konstruktor gađa .... Sissy projekat gađa da zvuči kao Defisit a ne SET.....