Boki, sa scan speak sheet mozes da vidis preklapanja, i ukoliko nemas realne podatke za t/s da se igras sa merenjem
https://www.scan-speak.dk/technical/tech-notes/
It is really important to understand that we are working with “small signal” parameters, which means that the excitation of the moving parts is so small that the mechanical properties can be considered to operate in their linear range. It is also important to realize that any small change of measurement method will result in different results. In fact, there are different ways of measuring these parameters in the market, and they are being used by different systems manufacturers to align or tune loudspeaker systems. So there is no one “correct” set of parameters, but several sets that could potentially be used and the key is to stick with one method and evaluate whether the resulting system response matches your simulation results. If you find an adequate match then that is what you should use.
vidi, meni je falila dubina na basu, to sam i uocio kada prvi put merio bass nearfild. Sa povecanjem zapremine ja sam taj pad spustio nize i ono sto sad cujem, meni je sasvim ok . Nijanse su u pitanju, sa kojima mozes merenjem da podesavas port
Vise sam paznje posvecivao na Q faktore, jer oni su izgleda mnogo bitni, sama izrada kucista i to...Meni je sad veci problem kako da prosirim rupu sa 38 na 58 L nego da se jurim da radim T/S. Sa ovim sto cujem sasvim dovoljno za moj ukus .
Sledece sto moram da radim je Arta ljig, za sva ostala merenja, prevashodno FRD i ZMA fajlove, i onda igranjac, u simulacijama. Slusanje, sim, slusanje, sim...Za to mi treba vreme, komponente i prevashodno prostor
Zelim ti Srecnu Novu godinu