Mikorist

mogu da predju na Mars kada im iseku DNS. problem je sto vecina ljudi ne zna kako Internet funkcionise. predrasude, gluposti, neobrazovanje, i ponesto tacno, ali retko. http://www.workersco....php?news=13273Internet ne samo sto je "made in USA" nego je USA "nadprovajder" svima takodje. From the heart of the United States, Level 3 : http://www.level3.com/en/global-reach/ ovo nije zavera - ovo je cinjenicno stanje stvari.

izgleda da cemo da gledamo njegov serijal:http://youtu.be/5LlaF2AoL-o

ima ponovo da pocnu da rade cd/dvd - video klubovi - bioskopi i ljudi - i bioskopi - djenka ce ponovo da jase.na djenkinom plakatu -lepo pise -Nas Bioskop - "Nova Evropa" hahahah

zamislite da svaki vas video mora da odobri administrator na YouTube - posto ne postoji drugi nacin da se spreci Copyright.pa ima dva videa i dva coveka da ostanu na njemu. razornije od svega predstavlja gomila onih koja sedi skrstenih ruku dok ih neko pri tom *ebe u zdrav mozak

nadam se da nece -posledice ce biti strahovite.

posle megauploada - ne vidim zasto onda ne bi mogli da ugase YouTube, Vimeo, Flickr, Photobucket, i sve ostaleulpoad sajtove u bilo kojoj formi zato sto ljudi mogu da uploaduju fajlove za koje nemaju autorska prava - copyrights.bice nam dovoljan i modem od 56kne moramo da se zamaramo sa dvocifrenim(megabitnim) konekcijama kako bismo (samo) besplatno skinuli email -procitali novine i sl.

Anonymous Has Hacked The Department Of Justice, Universal Music And RIAA Websites In Retaliation For Megaupload Anonymous has claimed responsibility for hacking the Department of Justice, Universal Music Group, and RIAA websites. According to their Twitter account, it's in retaliation for the federal shutdown of file-sharing site Megaupload.com. (via Gizmodo) UPDATE: Gizmodo's reporting that the MPAA.org and U.S. Copyright Office websites are also down. http://www.businessi...ice-riaa-2012-1

U.S. indicts alleged copyright pirates; FBI hacked in retaliation - UPI.comwww.upi.comShortly after the U.S. Justice Department filed online piracy charges against megaupload.com and related sites, hackers said they took down the FBI's site.http://www.upi.com/T...1/?spt=hs&or=tn

Then they may as well shut down YouTube, Vimeo, Flickr, Photobucket, and all other upload sites of any form because people are able to upload files of which they might not own the copyrights.

SOPA: Could This Be The End Of YouTube?

megaupload is shut down look: http://latimesblogs....cy-by-feds.html

http://www.diyaudio.rs/topic/4472-kako-napraviti-studio-from-scratch/

da se kladimo da nema jedan forum/sajt u Srbiji koji je cist od linkova koji vode ka sajtovima koji krse Copyright - a i globalno - pa ima da pogase ceo internet

moze neko da stavi link u potpis - ka "losslessjazz"i ode ceo forumkoje ce da budu samo zloupotrebe ako ovo uvedu

jedan primer.neko postavi knjigu - pdf koja je zasticena na neki sajt - server.prvo odseku taj sajt i server.onda odseku sve sajtove koji vode na taj sajt.da se ne vide u USA.kraj.gore od Hitlera.

ovaj deo je najbitniji.na ovaj nacin mogu da odseku bilo koji sajt na svetu. dakle ako je samo jedan , jedini link na sajtu koji vodi ka piratskom sadrzaju ili materijalu koji je zasticen - odseku te. a to je sirok pojam. npr. neko ovde samo postavi link ka sadrzaju (zvuk, video, tekst koji je zasticen ) na nekom drugom sajtu - odseku nas.

Why is Wikipedia blacked-out? Wikipedia is protesting against SOPA and PIPA by blacking out the English Wikipedia for 24 hours, beginning at midnight January 18, Eastern Time. Readers who come to English Wikipedia during the blackout will not be able to read the encyclopedia. Instead, you will see messages intended to raise awareness about SOPA and PIPA, encouraging you to share your views with your representatives, and with each other on social media. What are SOPA and PIPA? SOPA and PIPA represent two bills in the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate respectively. SOPA is short for the "Stop Online Piracy Act," and PIPA is an acronym for the "Protect IP Act." ("IP" stands for "intellectual property.") In short, these bills are efforts to stop copyright infringement committed by foreign web sites, but, in our opinion, they do so in a way that actually infringes free expression while harming the Internet. Detailed information about these bills can be found in the Stop Online Piracy Act and PROTECT IP Act articles on Wikipedia, which are available during the blackout. GovTrack lets you follow both bills through the legislative process: SOPA on this page, and PIPA on this one. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to advocating for the public interest in the digital realm, has summarized why these bills are simply unacceptable in a world that values an open, secure, and free Internet. Why is the blackout happening? Wikipedians have chosen to black out the English Wikipedia for the first time ever, because we are concerned that SOPA and PIPA will severely inhibit people's access to online information. This is not a problem that will solely affect people in the United States: it will affect everyone around the world. Why? SOPA and PIPA are badly drafted legislation that won't be effective at their stated goal (to stop copyright infringement), and will cause serious damage to the free and open Internet. They put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. And, SOPA and PIPA build a framework for future restrictions and suppression. Does this mean that Wikipedia itself is violating copyright laws, or hosting pirated content? No, not at all. Some supporters of SOPA and PIPA characterize everyone who opposes them as cavalier about copyright, but that is not accurate. Wikipedians are knowledgeable about copyright and vigilant in protecting against violations: Wikipedians spend thousands of hours every week reviewing and removing infringing content. We are careful about it because our mission is to share knowledge freely. To that end, all Wikipedians release their contributions under a free license, and all the material we offer is freely licensed. Free licenses are incompatible with copyright infringement, and so infringement is not tolerated. Isn't SOPA dead? Wasn't the bill shelved, and didn't the White House declare that it won't sign anything that resembles the current bill? No, neither SOPA nor PIPA is dead. On January 17th, SOPA's sponsor said the bill will be discussed in early February. There are signs PIPA may be debated on the Senate floor next week. Moreover, SOPA and PIPA are just indicators of a much broader problem. In many jurisdictions around the world, we're seeing the development of legislation that prioritizes overly-broad copyright enforcement laws, laws promoted by power players, over the preservation of individual civil liberties. How could SOPA and PIPA hurt Wikipedia? SOPA and PIPA are a threat to Wikipedia in many ways. For example, in its current form, SOPA would require Wikipedia to actively monitor every site we link to, to ensure it doesn't host infringing content. Any link to an infringing site could put us in jeopardy of being forced offline. http://en.wikipedia....tive/Learn_more

ne.

probajte da otvorite nesto na Wiki

A Political Coming of Age for the Tech Industry The Web sites on Wednesday of, clockwise from top left, Google, Mozilla, Wired and Wikipedia. Wikipedia’s home page on Wednesday warned users that the Web site would be blacked out for 24 hours. "This is the first real test of the political strength of the Web, and regardless of how things go, they are no longer a pushover. The Web taking a stand against one of the most powerful lobbyers and seeming to get somewhere is definitely a first." - Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia Law School on the efforts by the technology industry to fight Congressional bills aimed at curbing online piracy. http://www.nytimes.c...?pagewanted=all