Mikorist

Tangband? --- sve je to jeftino djubre koje Kinezi stancuju svabama na kilo... (Tangband, CSS, Mark audio i ostala boranija) Moze taj visokotonac da "radi" na 1500hz ali tiho. Na većoj snazi membrana iskace z linearnog režima (+-0,1mm) i kreće u distorziju odnosno svira kao slusalica iz hi-fi telefona

slusao sam Revelator (verovatno najbolje napravljen u Srbiji) - do skoro sam mislio da je to i najbolje sto sam cuo u zivotu od Hi-Fi sad slusam 3D-Fi iz dve tacke Revelator Revelator Revelator

evo ti i nacrt ovo je sjajno i za TDC

RCA LC-1C da li je moguce da RCA svira 26Hz sa 94 db ?

napredak tehnologije

od majstor kvariša - od kojih sam prvi ja

zavisi od velicine membrane zvucnika - velicine kutija i broja decibela - naravno kakav je zvucnik u pitanju odnosno kvalitet izrade drajverameni je dosta u tolkoj sobi sa Tanoyima ( 25cm drajver) od 92db - oko 20w - znaci na pozicij od 10 sati (NAD od 50w) bubne opne razara - ne moze da se stigne nikad do klipinga - jer moze da se rikne pre toga

gde si bre stein nema te nigde?

:buehehe:

Eve gi

dzaba i NAUK koji sam kacio na kobasice kad nisam mogao da cujem ovo sto sad cujem.ovo svira bar za 2 klase (visoki tonovi cak 3 puta ) bolje od starih Cabasse. :Viannen_loungelizard:dakle nista kablovi ne vrede bez jebeno dobrih zvucnika

Graphic demonstration of cable frequency response: Advertisers and consumers talk about different cables performing differently in the highs, lows, and so forth. Spectrum analysis shows the actual frequency response of the cables, proving or disproving those statements. For this analysis I used TrueRTA software. The audio converter I used has an output impedance (z out) of 50 ohms, which is about the same as an active instrument; and an input impedance (z in) of 1 Meg, which is typical for most amp heads, both vintage and modern. I found that with those impedances, all of the cables had totally identical frequency response--meaning they do exactly the same job of conveying lows, mids, and highs, without variation, from 10 Hz to 20 KHz. You can see that here in an analysis comparing the two highest-capacitance and two lowest-capacitance cables: (Click on image for a larger view) The glitches you'll see at 60 Hz and 180 Hz are artifacts from the power wiring in the room. In order to show a visible difference in cable performance, I had to raise the z out and lower the z in. I raised the z out by running the test signal (pink noise) in series with a passive P-bass pickup, and I lowered the z in by putting a 1 Meg resistor in parallel with the input. This also shows an exaggerated view of the type of tone changes that can be heard with a passive guitar. Here is an analysis of ten of the cables side-by-side: After that test I bought three more cables, so here are those plus two of the high and low capacitance cables from the first test: (Click on the images for a larger view) The capacitances of all the cables are listed on this page. These charts demonstrate that with a passive instrument, a cable's capacitance has a direct correlation to the amount of high-frequency content it can carry effectively. With an active instrument, it makes no difference. They also show that even in an extreme case, the cables perform identically in the lows, and the mids never drop in level unless the highs get rolled off that far. In other words, claims about a cable having "deeper, stronger bass", "scooped mids", or "polite low mids" are all completely false. In the case of a musician testing with their ears, these qualities are just in their imagination, a trick of our brains hearing what they want to hear--it honestly happens to the best of us. In the case of a company that makes or sells these cables, those descriptions are not entirely honest. Sometimes they even use tone-describing terms like etching, glare, smearing, resolution, and so forth, but these descriptions are just meaningless garbage in the context of instrument cables. Here's a page where I tested those claims. They will also try to snow you with a bunch of scientific-sounding claims about inductance,skin effect, current bunching, and resonance--but those don't have any measurable or meaningful effect on audio frequencies in instrument cables. They are only relevant in the MHz and GHz ranges, at lengths of over a mile, so don't be fooled by the fake "science" in cable marketing. In spite of those brain tricks or marketing voodoo, there can be some times when swapping different cables into your rig really will cause an audible difference! Here's how: a guitar's pickups, their vol/tone wiring, the cable, and the amp or pedal at the other end all interact to form a passive filter (a simple EQ). The variable that changes the shape of the filter is the total capacitance of the cable. As shown in the "visible difference" graphs above, this filter can roll off the highs, and boost a narrow hump just below the point where the highs roll off. The closer the z out value at one end of the cable is to the z in at the other end, the more exaggerated and audible the filter becomes; the graphs show an extreme example of this. Even small adjustments of your volume or tone knobs can have a noticeable impact on that filter shape. However, with an ideal impedance relationship between two pieces of gear, the filter has no effect at all--the frequency response is perfectly flat, as shown in the very first graph. A good-quality buffer creates an ideal impedance relationship. That's precisely why onboard preamps were invented. For more about what this all means in practical terms, check out this page of examples. And of course you still have to consider the most important thing: how well were the cables made? Click here to read my opinions of the construction quality, and value, of the cables I tested. Source: http://www.ovnilab.c...es/cables.shtml ------------ P.S. na 50 clanaka i postova o tome koji kabl bolje svira - moze se naci 50 clanaka koji objasnjavaju da to nema veze sa zivotom... vise naginjem na polovinu onih likova koji kazu da su price o kablovima hoax ...no... imam neko svoje izdvojno misljenje... licno ne cujem neku veeliku razliku izmedju unutrasnjeg zvucnickog ozicenja (kablovi izmedju drajvera i skretnica - direktno lemljeni za njih) sa no name 0,25mm solid core i visezilnog VDH 2.96 / AWG 12.5 oba Silver coated high purity OFC ista je prica i sa spoljasnjim ozicenjem.... izabrao sam na Tannoyima CS - 12 HF VDH za unutrasnje ozicenje i za bass i za visoke - a spolja je bakarni high purity OFC Neotech u rangu od 250 dinara po metru ako je resistance za VDH 0.58 Ohm/100 meter - koliko je na 50 santimetara ? razmisljam o tome kao kad treba da se izabere dzemper - pa onda biramo da li je rucno pleten ili moderan konfecijski - da li je deblji ili tanji - ako vam je toplo i udobno - to je to... nema price vise....

kad dolazis na slusanje ? ti si bar na 50 metara odavde ... da vidimo tvoje reakcije

dodji da cujes kod mene kako svira bolji obican kabl "neotech" iz kanibala - mislices da je tozla

kad bi Apple preselili u Srbiju propao bi za par godina