neskor

Na srecu u Beogradu postoje ljudi koji jos znaju i imaju opremu da vrse servis i kalibraciju studijskih magnetofona.

Iole ozbiljniji snimci idu na minimum 15 IPS / 38.10 cm/s dok vrhunski studiji koriste 30 IPS / 76.2 cm/s. Brzina od 7 IPS /19 cm/s se koristi samo za kucnu radinost. Imao sam Nakamichi Dragon sveze srvisiran i kalibrisan i mogu reci da nije ni priblizno zvucao kao stari Studer B67 MKII. Nemojte se uopste zanositi da vrhunski dek moze da zvuci bolje od vrhunskog R2R

Daans sam naleteo na zanimljiv post coveka koji ima vrhunski R2R i vinil sistem. Evo sta on kaze: The short answer is that R2R is very significantly better than a high quality LP system, providing the source material is ok (s0me tapes haven't survived as well as others, for instance). 1) Speed stability - absolutely rock solid with tape - no wavering on piano notes etc.. Verdier is very good, but you can hear the (very subtle) knock from the knot in the linen thread on every platter rotation 2) Dynamic range - the Verdier with the battery PSU is pretty much inky black on the blank grooves in between tracks. No vinyl noise or mechanical noise. With tape, you can get a tiny bit of tape hiss, esp if the tape used is several generations down from the original; you can minimise this by using something like Dolby A or Dolby SR (I have 2 Dolby 363 machines with A and SR - I just haven't got round to plugging them in yet). However, the tape medium is able to capture and transmit a much greater dynamic range compared to the grooves of an LP. After all the mastering engineer has to apply compression and EQ to cut the lacquer. You can hear this difference very easily between a master tape and a good vinyl pressing. 3) Sound quality on tape is the same at the end as at the beginning - unlike records. Tape has a constants linear velocity of medium over the head (transducer). Records have a constant angular velocity, which means that the amount on information gets less and less with each rotation of the record; hence the inner grooves don't sound as good. 4) Microdynamics are much better on tape - subtleties of brush use on drums, additional bits (e.g. the crowd noise and applause on Sgt Pepper's). General dynamics are faster with tape i.e. drums, crescendos etc 5) Soundstage is uncompromised on tape (obviously this depends on the original recording). I have been listening to hi-fi for 35 years now, and the last two years of R2R have been a complete revelation. I have heard some very good vinyl replay systems in my life, but none of them approach a 15 IPS master tape.

Tannoy ponovo pokrece proizvodnju legendarnih modela

za svaku preporuku da ih vec nemam ne bih se dvoumio ni sec

ja imam te trafoe iz sonija ako je iz trakasa onda je to ovo

ni jedan od tih ovo je to

bilo je mnogo lepsih i bolje uradjenih Hiraga na KP ovo ne bih ni stapom takao

pa lampe za njega te izadju 10 EUR, ako ides na ruske lampe

pogledaj lampasko OTL pojacalo Darkvoice 336 moze da se nabavi za normalne pare ja sam preadovoljan kako zvuci sa HD600 poredio sam sa par DIY lampaskih pojacala i odgovorno tvrdim da za te pare je apsolutni best buy

gde vidis ti choke tamo?

mislis 929 :))

EMT 938 je inace kostao 6000 DM kada se pojavio. To je gramofon koji je zvucno iznad SP10 MKII. Dosta slican starijem bratu EMT 948, isti motor i elektronika samo sto je postavljena na jednoj ploci umesto na izdvojenim el. plocama kao kod 948 ili 950. Nisam imao priliku da ga slusam ali kazu da je EMT 950 najbolji DD (neki kazu i cak najbolji uopste) gramofon ikada proizveden.

to je plastikaner/igracka u odnosu na ozbiljnije sprave tipa B67 ili A810/807, a da ne spominjem A80 ili A820 ne vredi tih para, za upola manje para mozes da nabavis A810/807

ides na google rezultat i stisnes mali trougao i izaberes kesirani i izadje ti ovo http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NOna5C5ftCgJ:nwavguy.blogspot.com/+&cd=1&hl=sr&ct=clnk&gl=rs

Plith sam ja pravio ovde u BG. Meni se cini da je bolje svirao skeleton plinth. To nije bas validno poredjenje jer je dosta vremena proteklo u medjuvremenu, a i pitanje je da li se isto cuju ta dva Garrarda. Bilo bi dobro kada bi se isti gramofon testitao na oba plintha.

probaj da otvoris kesiranu stranu iz google rezultata

Inace pre neki dan sam uradio uporedni test Garrard 401 vs Thorens TD124 MKII vs EMT 930st. Sva tri su koriscena samo kao transport. Svaka baza je inace sveze servisirana. U svim poredjenjima rucka je bila Thomas Schick od 12" sa Ortofon SPU Gold zvucnicom , samo se baza menjala. PO MENI, definitivno EMT 930st je bio pobednik u svim segmentima, zatim vrlo blizu Garrard, a tek zatim Thorens.

evo malo zanimljivosti: In 1980 at the peak of all things analogue, when the Japanese major manufactuers were still trying to come up with the perfect statement product to take on the rest of the world, Stereo Sound Magazine journalists Fuyuki Segawa and Keizo Yamanaka reviewed the best of the best with honours...And the finest turntables in the world were1st = EMT 930st (German Idler Drive)1st = Pioneer Exclusive P3 (Japanese Direct Drive)2nd = Sony PS-X9 (Japanese Direct Drive)2nd = Micro RX/RY-5000 (Japanese Belt Drive)3rd = Linn Sondek LP-12 (British Belt Drive)3rd = Pioneer Exclusive P10 (Japanese Direct Drive)3rd = Micro RX-3000 (Japanese Belt Drive)3rd = Marantz TT-1000L ( US / Japanese Direct Drive)3rd = Yamaha PX-1 (Japanese Direct Drive)3rd = Thorens TD-126 mkIIIC (Swiss / German Belt Drive)3rd = Technics SP-10mkII (Japanese Direct Drive)3rd = Luxman PD-555 (Japanese Direct Drive)3rd = Kenwood L-07D (Japanese Direct Dri

samo se vi zezajte ali ja sam zahvaljujuci Shiga transportu poceo opet da slusam CD :)))

pa zar se u ovom hobiju ne svodi sve na "licne preferencije i subjektivne osecaje" tako valjda i biramo uredjaje na kraju

i ja sam svoj Thorens TD125 MKII odmah bacio u oglase kada sam cuo matori Dual idleras (koji sam kupio za 30 EUR) nije sve u merenju, ima nesto i u cupkanju nogom

evo merenja za Garrard 501 idler 501 Inspiration Rumble - 79 dB Wow and flutter < 0.05 (test limit)

ima ovde : http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/analogue-source/243656-measuring-rumble.html