#101
Odgovor 21 November 2009 - 14:25
#102
Odgovor 21 November 2009 - 14:58
#103
Odgovor 21 November 2009 - 20:17
Br. 1, a sto su internet uticnice isto u hodnicima? Jesu li to ne pismeni UDBAsi?
A strah je uvijek bio mocno oruzije za upravljanje masom sto su novinari poceli koristiti.
#104
Odgovor 22 November 2009 - 09:25
ninja, za 21 November 2009 - 20:17, kaže:
Ne znam ko ima autorska prava na taj izum, ali metod je isti...
Uzgred, pricu nisam izmislio. Cuo sam je od coveka koji je vrlo upucen u topic.
ninja, za 21 November 2009 - 20:17, kaže:
Well, moj internet prikljucak nije u hodniku
Uostalom, mnogo stvari u stanovima nisu na svom mestu ili sto je jos gore - na pogresnom su.
Kada sam kupovao stan, pitam nadzornika radova gde je mesto za sporet. On mi pokaze gde je a onda ga ja ljubazno pitam "Zasto je trofazna uticnica iza sporeta? To je neprakticno i odbija sporet od zida za desetak cm. A kako ste zamisli da otvorim rernu na sporetu kada ste radijator zakovali tik do sporeta?"
Odgovor je bio ocekivan - "Uh, jbte, nije nam palo na pamet..."
Ja sam jos dobro prosao. Komsija dva sprata iznad mene nije mogao da udje u kupatilo jer vrata udaraju u lavabo
#105
Odgovor 23 December 2009 - 21:52
#106
Odgovor 23 December 2009 - 21:54
#107
Odgovor 26 December 2009 - 22:07
#108
Odgovor 30 August 2010 - 11:37
Mozda ce nekom biti interesantno da procita...
Vacccination Education
Citat
Here is a hypothetical comparison that will explain the controversy over vaccines in a very simple manner. Peanut butter, for example, is enjoyable to eat and nutritious. It is healthy for you and causes no harm, as a majority to all people. It’s clearly good to eat it, right? Approximately 1.5 million Americans are allergic to peanut butter so roughly 1 out of every 300 persons has serious adverse reactions to peanut butter. Now imagine that there was no way to determine if you were that 1 in 300 that has a negative reaction to eating peanut butter? This is the case for many vaccines. Now imagine that this 1 in 300 number is, for whatever reason, inaccurate and you were not told that it may be higher, say substantially higher?
Some vaccines have higher adverse reaction rates than people think and some have those high rates even after passing clinical trials with lesser recorded rates, even though the studies show they are much higher. If someone were to object to peanut butter because of adverse reactions, that is the same as someone objecting to certain vaccines because of the adverse reaction rates. Now imagine if there were clinical studies hinting at the possibility that a very high number of reactions to eating a certain brand of peanut butter on the market, say 1 in every 10 or 20 people, result in a serious neurological disease, paralysis or even death? Imagine if a few peanut butter manufacturing companies were caught selling expired products, contaminated goods or even adding potentially carcinogenic additives in their product? Welcome to the world of vaccines. Objecting to a vaccine is not the same as saying all vaccines are harmful. It’s all about a game of fractions.
Slične Teme
| Tema | Forum | Započeto od | Statistika | Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
zakačeni zanimljivi & smešni na You Tube
|
General Off Topic | Leonardo |
|
|
1 Korisnik (a) čita ovu temu
0 članova, 1 gostiju, 0 anonimnih korisnika



Pristupi
Registruj se
Nazad na vrh











